Nine states reject Microsoft antitrust deal
Maybe it’s just me, but I’m just ready from some closure on this. I’m almost of the opinion: ‘Let them do what they want. They’ll do it anyway.’
Maybe it’s just me, but I’m just ready from some closure on this. I’m almost of the opinion: ‘Let them do what they want. They’ll do it anyway.’
Something I’ve noticed recently in the non web-design world that I think web-designers (especially those obsessed with rules about usability) can learn a vaulable lesson from: Most VW New Beetle owners actually in fact use their flower holders.
Why this is important can be broken down into 2 seperate ideas that come together to make a sucessful whole: 1) The flower holders (I’ve heard) actually get in the way a little bit of using the windshield wiper toggle switch. Not so much as to hinder the use of it, but to make you think twice about it. (Again, that’s just a rumor. I haven’t tried it myself…) and 2) VW knows its market with that car so well that they could accurately predict that a flower holder is something they would want. Let’s face it. It’s not a standard accessory and probably never will be, except in this case.
The point I’m trying to make is that branding and market-research do in fact hold sway over usability when it comes to customer experience. Now, the flower-holder doesn’t get in the way of shifting the car’s gears or turning the steering wheel or make the car any less smooth a ride on the road. It would be ridiculous if it did hinder those things. But by accepting the minor loss of having their wiper switch not work like other cars, they make the tremedous gain of having people very happy with their purchase, happy enough to put flowers in it, on a regular basis I might add.
Now, I’ve drawn similar theories about website design from the automobile industry before and have had them dismissed because people have been around cars for the better part of 100 years and websites are still in their infancy, making people more adept at figuring out a car’s ‘interface’ and that making a car move can only be one way out of like 4 total ways (automatic, manual, truck-style automatic, and semi-auto), making it very easy to figure out which way the car needs to be manipulated. Websites, on the other hand, can be any number of navigation styles and even within those, people take liberties with how you get your job done there. And the argument I’ve made against this is that, yes, people have been dealing with automobiles longer than computers/the internet and, yes, the interfaces are much more varied and confusing.. but I also think that there’s somewhat of a sliding scale… sure, cars took 100 years to get where they are today, mostly because of advances in technology. The internet has skyrocketed technology-wise and people are ready for whatever comes next. It’s not that people weren’t ready for cars like we have today 50 years ago, the technology just didn’t exist to create and sustain them.
But I digress.
The most important sentence from above is: Branding and market-research do in fact hold sway over usability when it comes to customer experience, at least when the idea in question does not get in the way of the actual major function of the product. I guess I just wanted to point out the simple fact that people do use their New Beetle’s flower holders, for whatever reason and that the internet could be viewed with the same openness to new ideas as VW had been when someone said ‘Hey. What about a place to put a flower?’ Or when someone at Apple said ‘Hey. What about blue?’
“When a rough night leads to a rough morning…”
Why didn’t someone do this before? It is an essentially untouched niche market. I’ve always used Vitamin B12 and that works well.
Apparently, Microsoft has discovered something revolutionary: the traditional Windows Desktop sucks. I’m not talking about the Windows metaphor or any other such nonsense; I’m talking about the actual ‘desktop’ for Windows 2000 and below. What they’ve found is that the bulk of their users (beginners) don’t understand that desktop and are afraid of it, but only use 3-4 applications in a single session, making for frustration and ‘failure’ because theoretically the desktop should be the place they use to hold links to those applications. And I can only think that this has come about because they totally copied the Mac desktop metaphor, only wrong. Instead of actual icons representing actual things that actual actions can be taken upon, they instead decided to use the desktop as a space for shortcuts to documents, applications and ‘My Computer.’ Have you ever tried to make an alias to a directory and put THAT on the Windows desktop? You can’t do it, at least not in Windows 98. It was Microsoft’s choice to ignore Apple’s desktop ideas and come up with their own… like the idea of using a seperate application from the ‘desktop’ to access your hard drive and filesystem. So they’ve now found that their idea didn’t work. Duh.
I know it’s too early to have a year retrospective, but as of tomorrow, all of the media, toys, and whatnot that I have been craving start to flood into my life. Actually, tonight kind of feels like the day before a birthday, or Christmas. I can’t sleep. It’s just incredibly weird to know that in the next two months, everything I have been looking forward to for the past *year* is being released. Want insight into my horrible, horrible id? They’re not suprising to those who know me, but these things will rule my life:
Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 3 (for PS2)
Monsters, Inc.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone
Nintendo Gamecube
Rogue Leader (for aforementioned Gamecube)
Super Smash Bros. Melee (for Gamecube)
Lord of the Rings
the Royal Tennenbaums
All of those things have an insane amount of hype to live up to, and while I look forward to having a good time with them all, I never want to have a year like this again. It’s been unhealthy to live out the Fight Club quote: the things you own end up owning you.
Oh well. I’m going to be off playing Tony Hawk 3 (online!) and Grand Theft Auto 3 for the next couple of weeks. Fun knowing everyone. Go see “The Man Who Wasn’t There.” It’s awesome.
While at everyone’s favorite interactive agency and after-hours Quake facility tonight, my car got broken into. More to the point, my window got broken and the detachable face of my stereo got stolen. Not the entire thing, but just the face. And also some CD jewel cases that contained zero CDs. They happened to miss the cash on the passenger seat and the entire Case Logic CD caddy positively full of CDs right below that. Smart fuckers, these car stereo theives. It’s happened before, in my high-school era 1985 Corolla, so I’m not that shocked/apalled/stricken with grief as most people are the first time they get violated in such a mildly inconvenient way. This is when having a used-car sales manager for a major Denver-area Toyota dealer for a father-in-law proves to be an advantage. Well, this and the fact that we pay cost for near-new cars. But that’s another story.
I saw “Waking Life” the other night. Bear in mind that I fucking hate “Slacker” (though I realize its importance to indie film) and thought that “Dazed and Confused” was one of the more boring films around. That said, I recognize that I am not the desired definitive Gen-X demographic for those films. So he had a lot going against him. But I am a huge fan of animation, and found this whole rotoscoping technique to be very interesting.
But this will probably be the movie this year that I disliked the most.
Two main reasons: 1) Animation rotoscoping. Fantastic idea. Carried out very poorly. The sole reason I can find for having 8+ different objects in any given scene moving completely independently of each other is because it looks cool on drugs. And thats a stupid reason. I don’t get car sick, and I’ve always had a strong motion sickness immunity. But for the past two years, “Star Tours” at Disneyland has been messing with me. And it bugs. So anyways the film lurched my stomach forward instantly, but it stayed at a steadily upset, and never got out of hand. But it honestly seemed that he used this technique SOLELY to get peoples attention so that he could preach to them about reality for an hour and a half.
Which brings us to 2nd reason: the “story.” Did Mr. Linklater get help from Spaulding Gray on this one? What was the concept conversation like? “Hey, we *could* have people talk to each other, try to make it interesting and worthwhile, or we could have these ‘characters’ speak almost directly to the camera. About things that only that angry, bootwearing, hipster goth kid thinks is worthwhile!” I mean, I guess this film bugged because it touched directly on my general problems with most philosophy. While its great to contemplate whether or not life is real or not, whether we’re ants, or really just dead always, or any of that, it seems like most philosophy is a poor excuse for fucked up people to justify their socially irresponsible actions. “Hey, you can’t fuck me and just run out on me!” “But baby, you know that none of this happened, it ain’t real. Hey, lets do some crank!”
Basically, I don’t care whether or not you think you’re going to heaven, hell, be reincarnated, have nothing happen, or wake up from a dream, if you’re an ass *right now* in *this* life, then you should head to the next.
But most people should check out this pic, just to see what they think. While I barely enjoyed it (loved the dream stuff), and more people left the theatre than I have ever seen, I think it is a very ambitious film.
Can’t believe you said you “hate those people” who left the theatre, Kev. Harsh. Anyways, has anyone else seen this film? Flame on!
Remember the cleverly marked bomb?Well, if the Afghani troops really are ‘fags’ then maybe their guns look like this? Via Newstoday.
So the new poll isn’t the most thought-provoking or new idea in the world, but that’s okay. Think of it as a beta-test, which it actually is. If you run into problems let me know, but please don’t vote more than once, even though you currently can in fact do so. You are only to cast multiple votes if you: a. forgot what you voted for the first time, b. want to change your mind or c. really want to.