Cool nav

alternateorg on February 26, 2002

Not that it’s perfectly implemented, but I kind of like this agency’s navigation. How very David Small of them.

Reader interactions

22 Replies to “Cool nav”

  1. naked February 26, 2002 at 5:23 pm

    David Small? How about just “retardedly small?” These people suck… Plus, the entire site lacks OSX compatibility.

  2. ddmmyy February 26, 2002 at 5:51 pm

    Seems to work alright in OS X for me.

  3. naked February 26, 2002 at 5:57 pm

    i meant to add “so to speak” to the end of my last comment. i hope this clears up any confusion.

  4. steve February 26, 2002 at 6:15 pm

    you don’t like it? It’s been over-done, yes, but isn’t the developer the same guy that gave us miniml fonts?

  5. SU February 26, 2002 at 6:55 pm

    Definitely an interface that gets in the way of actually using this site. It’s funny… People haven’t learn that corporate sites (even their own) are not the place for interfaces you have to figure out. “Because we can” is not a good enough reason.

  6. SU February 26, 2002 at 6:56 pm

    Looks like your PHP ate my <Nielsen Hat> start and end tags.

  7. steve February 26, 2002 at 6:58 pm

    Very true SU.

  8. ~bc February 27, 2002 at 12:44 am

    Worked in OS X for me. I don’t find it visually appealing, I do feel it’s clever. Points for being semi-experimental. I like clever, but many people hate clever. I hate getting flash files without my prior approval. But since this was only like 20k, I won’t hold it against them.

  9. 808 February 27, 2002 at 11:03 am

    Oh my god, thats fucking hideous. Sorry kev… I have to disagree. 🙂

  10. DOS February 27, 2002 at 4:29 pm

    ~bc said “I hate getting flash files without my prior approval”. I’m confused by this. If you surf the web even semi-frequently, you are surrounded by flash files and probably not even aware of it.

  11. steve February 27, 2002 at 5:36 pm

    I’m just wondering who I have to sleep with to get a copy of Flash MX?

  12. naked February 26, 2002 at 5:23 pm

    David Small? How about just “retardedly small?” These people suck… Plus, the entire site lacks OSX compatibility.

  13. ddmmyy February 26, 2002 at 5:51 pm

    Seems to work alright in OS X for me.

  14. naked February 26, 2002 at 5:57 pm

    i meant to add “so to speak” to the end of my last comment. i hope this clears up any confusion.

  15. steve February 26, 2002 at 6:15 pm

    you don’t like it? It’s been over-done, yes, but isn’t the developer the same guy that gave us miniml fonts?

  16. SU February 26, 2002 at 6:55 pm

    Definitely an interface that gets in the way of actually using this site. It’s funny… People haven’t learn that corporate sites (even their own) are not the place for interfaces you have to figure out. “Because we can” is not a good enough reason.

  17. SU February 26, 2002 at 6:56 pm

    Looks like your PHP ate my <Nielsen Hat> start and end tags.

  18. steve February 26, 2002 at 6:58 pm

    Very true SU.

  19. ~bc February 27, 2002 at 12:44 am

    Worked in OS X for me. I don’t find it visually appealing, I do feel it’s clever. Points for being semi-experimental. I like clever, but many people hate clever. I hate getting flash files without my prior approval. But since this was only like 20k, I won’t hold it against them.

  20. 808 February 27, 2002 at 11:03 am

    Oh my god, thats fucking hideous. Sorry kev… I have to disagree. 🙂

  21. DOS February 27, 2002 at 4:29 pm

    ~bc said “I hate getting flash files without my prior approval”. I’m confused by this. If you surf the web even semi-frequently, you are surrounded by flash files and probably not even aware of it.

  22. steve February 27, 2002 at 5:36 pm

    I’m just wondering who I have to sleep with to get a copy of Flash MX?

Comments are closed.