It's just a snip off the top, really


the device is designed to be used in the same way as a tampon… This is then inserted by the woman. When the rapist attacks the woman and penetration takes place, the point of his penis will touch the section containing the blade and it (the penis), or at least a part of it, is sliced off.”

I can’t decide if this is entirely justifiable. I imagine that it is, but perhaps a dibilitating electric shock is more in order than a severance. A woman quoted in the article says something to the effect of this device being another precaution the woman has to take, and that any man who rapes should go to prison, end of story. While this is true, I can certainly see the allure an item like this might have to a woman who finds herself in uncomfortable circumstances. Would there be a risk of worse beating, even death, if this were to happen to one man in a group, and the rest decide teach the woman a lesson? I’m not sure… Another thing: Is this item really all that realistic? A woman doesn’t leave the house (I’m expecting) with the possibilty of rape on her mind, let alone the foresight to insert this before going to a party. Maybe more women should think that way. Someone is going to take that sentence the wrong way… All I’m saying is that this device puts the power back in the hands (in a matter of speaking) to the woman. At the risk of sounding like a new-age sensitive man, that’s something I’m all for.

Fuck everybody involved

I can’t scream this loud enough: FUCK INTUIT! FUCK WEBTURBOTAX. Fuck ’em all. Here’s what those jerks have done to me:

Two years ago, TurboTax for the Web worked perfect for me. I got my refund from both state and federal in under 2 weeks, and because of my low income then, I didn’t even have to pay for the service. Last year, my employer paid their accountant to do a number of the employees’ taxes. So this year, with perks like a low income and a free tax accountant gone, I figured I’d go back to TurboTax and get it done quickly and easily on the web, complete with electronic filing and refunding. I expected the same service and mediocre interface they had two years ago. This wasn’t the case, on both counts. Fortunately, the interface has gotten much better, and the Java app is much more responsive. Great, wonderful, grand. Their service, on the other hand, has gone to shit.

When I completed my taxes over two weeks ago, I made a mistake: I entered in my wife’s birthday wrong, something I often do. I got an email telling me that the IRS had responded to my electronic transmission, and that I could log in to my account, and see what the status was. It was rejected due to -surprise- the wrong birthdate entered in for the secondary filer. So I fixed that, and resubmitted. Couple days later, I get another email, telling me to check the website again. So I did, and this time, what was the problem? Apparently her social security number was wrong, as well as her birthdate, still. So I check all the sections pertaining to birthdates and social security numbers. Everything matches what’s on her W-2 perfectly. So I wait a few days, figuring I’d let the database get updated or whatever, and resubmit. Same fucking result.

So I check the help sections, and find a section that seems to be what I’m looking for: ‘What if my federal return gets rejected due to a wrong SSN, but I know that it’s right?’ Perfect. What’s their answer? Call the SSA, and verify that they have the correct records. Okay, so I call the 800 number. First call, I get shuffled randomly into finding information about my local office. When I enter in my zipcode, they tell me that they can’t find an office, and to CALL BACK. So I do. Second call, totally different message, and I get put on hold, then hung up on. Third call, same thing. Fourth call, they tell me to call back on a regular business day between the hours of 7am and 7pm.. the only place where it isn’t between those hours is in fucking Hawaii at this point in the day.

So I figure I need to just redo the whole thing by hand. So I call Intuit looking for a refund. First of all, their site says that their support is entirely web-based (web-based help I have like zero confindence in), and that their support costs a certain amount of money PER MINUTE. So I search their web-based help, and there’s a hidden number if you’re looking for a refund. So I call, and after 24 minutes of being on hold, some jerk is trying to tell me that it’s a problem with my ISP’s server and some damn thing with cookies… Don’t try to tell a web designer how the fucking internet works. So I have to PRINT out my return, and mail it, because my ISP’s server is in some sort of loop, and keeps sending the same return over and over again. Fuck those guys, fuck that shit.

I’m one of the biggest web proponents you’ll meet… if it’s web-based, I’ll try it. But it’s this kind of thing that is holding the web back right now.. servers going into loops and poorly designed systems that fail. Like EK at SVN says, the technology should be transparent to the customer.. I shouldn’t have to print out a form that I was expecting to submit electronically just because some dude’s server ain’t working right. If I’m a 40-year old mechanic, how am I supposed to understand cookies and server loops? All I know is that I was told by my son that the web is the future, and that I should file electronically this year. Well screw that and this whole web thing. I can walk down the block to buy a book, and can do my taxes in my kitchen in one night, not three weeks on the web.

Design vs. Code

Jen has posted a rant on why designers should know the code (HTML, at least…. we’re not talking about Cold Fusion or PHP here) that builds their site designs. Interesting, and I’m always one to advocate that designers know what their designs need in order to function.

In the wrong hands…

This is the last thing anyone needs. It’s called ActionBars, and it’s a GUI-driven application that writes what seems to be a Java applet for navigation on websites, complete with SOUND and rollover and clicked states. Like it was so hard to do in Flash, and like ANY site really needs it, especially using pre-defined color schemes, designs and soundsets. Wonder-fucking-ful. More power to the sub-par designer with no skill or knowledge of the internet. Maybe they should just bundle it with a Photoshop filter package.

X response

This post is in response to a post on SVN regarding MacOS X:


Sick of the OS X hype…
Yes, I am inviting a flaming deluge of comments here, but at least hear me out before you start writing back in ALL CAPS.
There are two things about the swarm of commentary on OS X among the Mac faithful that have me scratching my head.
The first:

Mac OS X is the future!

It might be the future for MacOS users, but to the rest of the computing world it’s old news. Ah yes, an OS that doesn’t crash once a day — let us all exult at the revolution! An OS that has support for more than one processor — by Zeus, my world has changed. An OS based on the tried and true UNIX (which is itself 20 years old), if that’s not a revolution, I don’t know what is! Now that brings me to my second point of confusion. I’ve read some form of the following in many a message board:

Unix is inside Mac OS X. It’s here to stay. That is a GOOD thing.

Why? Since when did UNIX become the only possible option in OS foundations? Yes, it certainly is stable and well understood, but what’s with this blind devotion to this very old technology. I’m disappointed that in the seventeen years since the release of the first version of what is now the MacOS Apple hasn’t come up with something better, particalarly considering the fact that Apple controls the entire widget (software and hardware). Jobs says that he wants OS X to be the foundation for the MacOS for the next fifteen years. If that’s the case I’ll be very bummed out because that would mean that very little of substance will have changed in the world of computing.

Here’s my point (which I’ve been slow in getting to), the current computing paradigm sucks. OS UIs are lame and OS X doesn’t do much to change that (prettier control widgets don’t cut it in my book). If that’s the best that they could muster then why not just develop skins for Windows 2000 or Linux?

Millions and millions of people have changed their behaviour and learned to cope with stupidly designed interfaces that force us to jump through the same hoops again and again and again and again. That needs to change if the real potential of the human/computer interface is to be realized, yet all anyone seems to be paying attention to is re-skinning existing interfaces and increasing MHz.

Why am I criticizing Apple? It may be unfair since Microsoft certainly does not seem to be doing anything better with Windows XP, but what do you expect from MS? What we’ve all come to expect from Apple is real change and OS X has been billed as a “revolutionary” product. Instead what Apple has delivered is an incrementally evolutionary product that has arrived about seven years later than it should have. Hey, no doubt that it’ll eventually be a boon to Mac users who won’t have to force reboot their computers several times a week, but it does nothing to solve the fundamental problems with current operating systems and that’s sad.

Ahem. Can I point out one small flaw in just what just about everyone is saying? I know at least one of the Signals crew disagrees with this analogy, but here goes: EK, you said yourself that UNIX is 15 years old, and that X has been in development in one form or another for 10 years. To us (computer users), that seems like a long time. But in reality, I think that expecting to see or being disappointed by not seeing ‘the future’ of the computer UI just 15 short years after its inception is wildly ridiculous. Here’s the analogy: cars. The design of the car did not significantly change 15 years after it was first designed, and in fact still hasn’t fundamentally changed, almost 100 years after its birth. What has changed? Comfort, style, & performance. Now, OSX might not have improved in comfort much yet, but in style and performance, compard to OS9, it’s off the charts. When I use classic now, I feel like I might as well be using System 6 or something… All this talk of Apple dismissing usability for creativity is, I feel, in error. Aqua is just an evolution of platinum. Were you this pissed when 7.6 or 8 came out (I can’t remember which had it) with the Aaron extension (renamed to appearance/platinum) that added nice 1px shadows and depth to windows and widgets? I doubt it, but with Aqua, everyone is up in arms that Apple is ignoring their own ideas, when that really isn’t true. I think, at least.

And one more thing: the act of getting upset with a company for distributing hype along with a new product is retarded. Sure, X isn’t the future: not yet. Apple is a company that needs to sell products in order to survive. Marketing furtheres that goal. Honestly, at this point, a true major evolution in the way humans interact with computers would not sell well, or even be regarded as such.

Jakob can suck it


Finally, to illustrate the importance for all designers to stick to HTML standards and conventions, Nielsen points to the omnipresent traffic light: “To my knowledge, there is no international standard that red means stop and green means go. But can you imagine what would happen at an intersection if someone decided to change that color convention on their own?

Yeah, great analogy, Jakob… only… to my knowledge, no one has ever DIED because of BAD WEB DESIGN. Jesus.

But I liked holding hands and singing…

An open letter from K10k to ‘CEOs of any media companies that are still (barely) alive:


Dear Mr. Bigwig CEO,

We know that your company is going through a hard time right now. We know that it seems like the end is near, and that truly nasty and drastic measures are being considered.

We know that you have probably been forced to fire some of your employees already, and that perhaps you’ll need to fire some more before you can make it back onto the road to profitability.

However, have you ever stopped to consider who it is you are actually firing? Yes, you’re firing production people – the people who helped build your company, who sweated blood & tears & other bodily fluids on super-late-night, we-love-the-company deadlines. You’re firing the backbone of the company – which is pretty damn stupid if you ever want to get back on your feet.

So take a step back – re-evaluate those layoff plans, and start cutting jobs in those sectors that sound oh-so-good when you’re a big company, but that in reality doesn’t do anything but provide a massive drain on company resources (and employee morale). You know who we mean, don’t you? If not, let us spell it out for you:

– Human Resources (no more employee handbooks)

– Project Management (i think we can handle it ourselves,
thank you very much)

– Middle Management (an end to the evil pointy-haired
micro-managing nazis)

– Senior Management (do you really need 6 senior VP’s who know even less about the internet that you do?)

– Anybody who has anything to do with team-building exercises (let’s hold hands – and sing – and perform for each other!)

– Anybody who has anything to do with quality control

That should do the trick. And might also convince the few remaining employees to give your company another chance.

You’re welcome.

Sincerely,
michael + toke + per / K10k”

Just about hit the nail on the head, as far as I’m concerned… If they hired the right people to do the production/design, QA & project management and everybody else on that list aren’t needed.

YA Napster Essay

Things have been kinda slow around here lately, and I’ve had this on my mind, now seemed like the right time to get it online.

I am so sick of reading weblogs and articles about people going around saying. “Yeah, well, I used Napster, sure, but I only downloaded things I couldn’t find anywhere else, and I always buy my favorite bands CDs the second they come out, and I’m a good little music consumer, so I don’t really care all that much that Napster is going down the tubes…” Napster is starting to be like some sort of wrist slap-bracelet fad kinda thing. If you mention now that you actually like it and actually use it INSTEAD OF BUYING MUSIC then you’re looked at now as some sort of sick fuck who is being totally and morally wrong. Fuck that shit. I used Napster to pirate music. There. I fucking said it.

So fucking sue me (I’m sure Metallica will try) that I don’t ENJOY putting gobs and gobs of money into record executives’ pockets. Fuck those guys. As far as I’m concerned, they’re like the people that make porn: They completely and utterly live off of the fact that someone else (the musician or pornstar) has had a shitty childhood or something else bad happen in their lives. What do I mean? Let me explain. Musicians write music because they’re sad. At least all the good ones anyway. Bad Religion is infinitely better than The Backstreet Boys because the music is real and felt and written because of emotion, not marketing. I just can’t bring myself to like the idea that record execs do absolutely nothing for society. The peddle other people’s ideas and emotions and feelings. Fuck that.

So back to the point. Napster is so wildly successful on such a massive scale for a couple reasons. The average Napster user is 18-24 (I’m assuming)… The people within that age range have some things to say by using Napster. The foremost statement is that music on the radio FUCKING SUCKS. All the music coming out in the past year has been worthless. At least the stuff in mainstream channels: MTV, the radio etc. So if mainstream channels are letting us down, we go to less-accepted ‘gray’ channels. Like any peer-to-peer filesharing network. FTP sites when I was in high school, Hotline when I was in college, and Napster when I joined the workforce and had a T1 at my disposable for 8 hours a day. If the channels are there, then I’m going to use them.

I do not feel guilty at all about illegally using Napser to get music that I want to enjoy. So I liked ONE Limp Bizkit song, and wanted to put on a compilation CD. So I downloaded it from Napster, and Fred fucking Durst or the guy that decided the album was going to be recorded didn’t get one dime from me. People enjoy music. They don’t enjoy paying for it. Add to that the fact that if I wanted to listen to a specific Cure song because I thought it would help me get a design to where I want it to be, and voila. Napster is the perfect solution.

Let me reiterate the most important sentence in this post: I do not feel guilty at all about illegally using Napser to get music that I want to enjoy. Not one bit, and you shouldn’t either. If the music industry gave a flying fuck about us as people who feel the same emotions as the music we buy instead of a way to get a title to #1 on the Billboard charts, then maybe, just maybe, this wouldn’t be such a problem for them. But they’ve been fucking us since the 50’s and now with digital technology we have the power to fight back. And we can. And we will.

It used to be 12k, now it's 4.8k

So I’ve officially entered the 5k contest… Don’t know what that is? It’s this contest for web developers/designers to design and code an HTML page or site wherein the files used do not surpass the filesize of 5k. The rules are a little more complicated than that, but hey. So check out my amended entry… What did I change about it? You can see the original if you are so inclined. The original was 12k, so I had to scale it down just a tad.

My description of it:

This page is a relatively vague and subtle comment on the pervasive nature of not only the internet, but the internet’s chief language: HTML. I felt the need to express myself as an artist, and coding a particular uneventful day (one that did in fact exist) seemed to be a good idea. I had to scale the code down a touch to fit under the 5k margin.
 

Youthful Design, Great Music

Apple has a new commercial from a band I really like. They take The Ataris’ “The Radio Still Sucks” and chop it up a bit and threw it into a commercial. Its intent is to tell people that the radio sucks (doesn’t take too much persuasion) and that burning your own mixes is the way to go. It’s not a bad commercial, using one of those fractal type plug-ins used in MP3 players. (– It’s actually from iTunes, the software Apple is selling in the commercial. iTunes is a repackaged, reskinned SoundJam MP. –kev)

On a related note, a band with a couple of my friends was used in a whole bunch of Apple commercials a few months ago. Unfortunately Apple took their name, Limbeck, and made it the Garage Monkeys. Apple offered them G4s as compensation but instead they decided to get a touring van. To each his own.